It appears I was wrong. There was no coup in Honduras. This could all be incorrect, but it is consistent with everything else I can find, and makes sense.
It seems that Obama might have been not only premature but entirely wrong, when he demanded that Honduras be run in a constitutional manner and restore Zelaya. According to the article Zelaya’s removal was not only permitted but required by the constitution, and restoring him would be unconstitutional. Another case of western leaders ignoring constitution in favour of their own politics? Not even his own constitution this time.