When the ACORN scandal hit the ‘community organisation’ had one excuse. They claimed that the undercover couple had visited many offices and been turned away, and only in a handful were they offered advice on how to cheat the taxes on money they earned from underage sex slaves.
In particular ACORN claimed Giles and O’Keefe were turned away from New York and San Diego offices (video evidence has already been shown that they were actually helped there). Most importantly they were not only refused advice in Philadelphia, but were told to leave the office and the police were called.
Errrrrrmmmmm, or not, as the case might be.
Incidentally the ACORN employee’s voice is muted, for legal reasons.
How can anyone who knows about this now fail to utterly condemn ACORN? How can ACORN continue to function, when they don’t know what else Andrew Breitbart has to release? How can they have any credibility when everything they have said has turned out to be a lie, because Breitbart really, really knows his business, knew exactly how ACORN would react and had the evidence to respond to everything, so ACORN’s defence only made things worse at every stage?
4 comments:
I doubt a man who has No Readers
Andrew Gatward Take a bow
@richard:
Why did you close this blog down? In itself, it's proof enough that your not Gatward. As he's not bright enough to manage something like this.
Thanks for the kind words, Don't Give Up. I had never even heard of Andrew Gatward, and have no idea who or what he is.
Sorry, but I've been too busy with work and life to blog. When I wrote this I was mostly unemployed. I stopped when I started working full-time. I have since found a new job, met a new woman and married her, moved four times and finally settled down.
Between that settling, my full-time job being quiet at the moment and a renewed interest in politics, I am considering starting again, hence my long-delayed return to look here. I will let you know if ever I do.
Post a Comment